Vietnamese lunar: 16/09/2026Fly To Sky Charity About usContactVI

Sustainability 360°Research · Insights · Solutions

⌕
FrameworksResearch

SDG Impact Standards – Impact management standards for the SDGs

Many companies claim to contribute to the SDGs, but few can show it is properly managed in strategy and operations. UNDP's SDG Impact Standards set practice standards for exactly that. On Sustainability 360° (Bền vững 360°), FTS CSRA experts analyse the four standards, their practice content, the path from self-assessment to the SDG Impact Seal and the link with ISO/UNDP 53001, launched in 2026.

FTS CSRA
3 min read
SDG Impact Standards – Chuẩn quản trị tác động hướng SDGs
SDG Impact Standards – Chuẩn quản trị tác động hướng SDGs · Photo: FTS CSRA
Contents
  1. Purpose and main structure
  2. 2.1. Four standard sets by user
  3. 2.2. Practice content of the enterprise standards
  4. Who uses it and how
  5. Practical example
  6. Notes for use in Vietnam

##

SDG Impact Standards – Chuẩn quản trị tác động hướng SDGs
SDG Impact Standards – Chuẩn quản trị tác động hướng SDGs · Ảnh: FTS CSRA

Overview and origin

ItemDetails
Vietnamese nameChuẩn tác động SDG (chuẩn quản trị tác động hướng tới các Mục tiêu Phát triển bền vững)
English nameUNDP SDG Impact Standards
Issuer / administratorUnited Nations Development Programme (UNDP), through the SDG Impact initiative.
NatureVoluntary internal management practice standards, not a reporting standard or indicator set. Includes a self-assessment tool, an assurance scheme and the SDG Impact Seal.
Reference scopeEnterprises, investment funds, bond issuers and development finance institutions; linked to the SDGs, the Five Dimensions of Impact, GRI and IRIS+.

UNDP launched SDG Impact in 2018. Standards for private equity funds and bonds followed in 2020–2021, the enterprise standards were released in 2021 and the guidance updated in October 2023. On 28 September 2026, ISO and UNDP launched ISO/UNDP 53001 – Management systems for the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals – Requirements, the first international standard for managing SDG contribution.

Purpose and main structure

Purpose: help organizations build sustainability and the SDGs into decision-making, so positive impact becomes part of strategy rather than a side activity. Each set has four standards: Strategy, Management approach, Transparency, Governance; each has practice indicators for self-assessment.

2.1. Four standard sets by user

Standard setUsers
SDG Impact Standards for EnterpriseEnterprises of any size
SDG Impact Standards for Private Equity FundsFunds and fund managers
SDG Impact Standards for Bond IssuersIssuers of sustainable, green and social bonds
OECD-UNDP Impact Standards for Financing Sustainable DevelopmentDonors and development finance institutions

2.2. Practice content of the enterprise standards

The table lists the Standard 1 guidance items using UNDP's numbering (guidance updated October 2023); for Standards 2–4, FTS CSRA summarises the main content groups. For self-assessment, use the exact practice indicators in the official standards.

ItemPractice content
Standard 1 – Strategy
1.1.1Making sustainability and the SDGs central and contributing positively
1.1.2Interdependency
1.1.3Foundational principles: business and human rights, transparency and anti-corruption, planetary boundaries, gender equality; science-based targets
1.1.4Understanding the sustainable development context
1.1.5Stakeholder identification
1.1.6Determining material impacts
1.1.7Business models, partnerships and collaborations
1.1.8Incorporating sustainability risks and opportunities
1.1.9Scenario and sensitivity analysis
1.1.10Adequate resourcing
1.1.11Strategy always on, embedding continuous improvement
1.2Impact goals aligned with purpose, strategy, stakeholder expectations and sustainability context
Standard 2 – Management approach
2.xIntegrate impact management into operations and decisions: indicators, data, thresholds; managing negative impacts; stakeholder participation; continuous improvement
Standard 3 – Transparency
3.xDisclose approach, goals and impact results (positive and negative) to stakeholders in an accessible, usable, comparable way
Standard 4 – Governance
4.xGoverning body commitment and oversight; accountability; remuneration linked to impact; culture that supports SDG contribution
The four SDG Impact Standards: Strategy, Management approach, Transparency, Governance.
Figure 1. The four SDG Impact Standards: Strategy, Management approach, Transparency, Governance. (AI-generated image) / Hình 1. Bốn chuẩn trong SDG Impact Standards: Chiến lược, Cách tiếp cận quản trị, Minh bạch, Quản trị. (Ảnh do AI tạo)

Who uses it and how

Users: companies with ESG strategies, conglomerates, impact funds, banks and issuers of green and social bonds.

  1. Download the standards and the self-assessment tool (Excel) for your organization type.
  2. Self-assess against each practice indicator; identify gaps.
  3. Build an improvement plan: impact goals, indicators, board oversight.
  4. Implement and disclose impact results transparently (e.g., using GRI and IRIS+).
  5. Engage an accredited assurer to qualify for the SDG Impact Seal; consider ISO/UNDP 53001 certification once a scheme exists.
The pathway from self-assessment to the SDG Impact Seal and the ISO/UNDP 53001 management system standard.
Figure 2. The pathway from self-assessment to the SDG Impact Seal and the ISO/UNDP 53001 management system standard. (AI-generated image) / Hình 2. Lộ trình từ tự đánh giá đến SDG Impact Seal và chuẩn hệ thống quản lý ISO/UNDP 53001. (Ảnh do AI tạo)

Practical example

Hypothetical case: Real-estate and energy Group R self-assesses against the SDG Impact Standards for Enterprise.
StandardGap foundImprovement action
1. StrategyNo SDG-based material impacts; no science-based targetsDouble materiality assessment; SBTi-aligned targets; priority on SDGs 7, 11, 13
2. Management approachNew projects lack a social impact assessment stepAdd an “impact gate” to investment approval
3. TransparencyReport lists only achievementsReport under GRI, disclosing negative impacts and missed targets
4. GovernanceExecutive pay not linked to impact20% of executive bonus linked to emissions and safety targets

Notes for use in Vietnam

  • A management standard, not a badge: do not advertise “SDG compliant” without independent assurance.
  • Combine with the VSDGs: check material impacts against Vietnam's 115 national targets.
  • Green and social bonds: Vietnamese issuers can use the bond standards to strengthen issuance frameworks and use-of-proceeds reporting.
  • ISO/UNDP 53001: watch for an equivalent national standard and certification arrangements in Vietnam.
  • Avoid duplicate files: data for the SDG Impact Standards can be reused for GRI, the UN Global Compact CoP and the CSI Index.

Method & scope

Content compiled and interpreted from FTS Impact Lab and documents of the issuing body; versions and sources should be verified before publication.

References

  1. UNDP SDG Impact – Practice Standards ↗ (accessed 2026-10-24)
  2. UNDP (Oct 2023) Standards Guidance for SDG Impact Standards for Enterprises ↗ (accessed 2026-10-24)
  3. UNDP – ISO and UNDP launch world's first International Standard to advance action on the SDGs (28 Sep 2026) ↗ (accessed 2026-10-24)
  4. Cross-references: SDGs; Five Dimensions of Impact; IRIS+; GRI (accessed 2026-10-24)
In-depth analysisExpert perspectivesSustainability trendsCase studiesCreating shared valueSustainability reportingSustainable economyCircular economyCommunity developmentSocial enterpriseResearch reportsFrameworksGlossaryCSR & ESG advisoryImpact measurement

Report an error or violation

Need research or consulting support? Contact →

More from this section

FrameworksResearch

Vietnam's sustainable development statistical indicators

Since 10 March 2025, Vietnam has applied a new set of 145 statistical indicators for sustainable development, replacing the 158-indicator set issued in 2019. On Sustainability 360° (Bền vững 360°), FTS CSRA experts list all 145 indicators across the 17 goals, explain how they are collected and published, and show how companies and organizations can link their data to the national indicators.

FrameworksResearch

B4SI – Business for Societal Impact

How much a company spends on communities is easy to count; what change that spending creates is what investors and society care about. On Sustainability 360° (Bền vững 360°), FTS CSRA experts introduce the B4SI framework: measuring inputs, outputs and impacts of community investment, the three motivation categories, the depth-of-impact scale and how to apply it to CSR programmes in Vietnam.

FrameworksResearch

SDGs – 17 Sustainable Development Goals

The 17 Sustainable Development Goals are the shared language of governments, companies and civil society to 2030, yet many reports stop at adding icons. On Sustainability 360° (Bền vững 360°), FTS CSRA experts set out all 17 goals, the 169 targets, suggested indicators for companies, how Vietnam localises the SDGs and how to link activities to the SDGs in a meaningful way.

FrameworksResearch

SROI – Social Return on Investment and the principles of social value

How much value does each dong spent on a social programme create for the community? SROI answers with a ratio, but the number is only credible when the principles are followed. On Sustainability 360° (Bền vững 360°), FTS CSRA experts explain the eight principles of social value, the six analysis stages, four impact adjustments and how to calculate the SROI ratio, with a worked example and notes for Vietnam.

Featured

Read more

All latest →
FrameworksResearch

OECD-DAC – Six programme evaluation criteria

A programme can complete all its activities yet still fail to create lasting change. The six OECD-DAC criteria help answer that question systematically. On Sustainability 360° (Bền vững 360°), FTS CSRA experts explain each criterion's definition, sample evaluation questions and indicators, a reference rating scale and how to apply them to ODA projects, social programmes and CSR in Vietnam.

FrameworksResearch

IRIS+ – Impact management metrics system

To compare impact across projects, you first need the same measuring stick. The GIIN's IRIS+ is the impact metrics catalogue most widely used by investors, with about 780 standardised, coded metrics. On Sustainability 360° (Bền vững 360°), FTS CSRA experts explain the IRIS+ structure, what metric codes mean, how to pick Core Metrics Sets and how companies and funds in Vietnam can apply them.

FrameworksResearch

Impact Frontiers – Five Dimensions of Impact

Saying “the project has positive impact” is not enough. You need to answer what impact, for whom, how much, what your real contribution is and what the risks are. On Sustainability 360° (Bền vững 360°), FTS CSRA experts explain the Five Dimensions of Impact stewarded by Impact Frontiers, the 15 data categories, nine impact risk types and the ABC classification, with examples for companies and funds in Vietnam.

FrameworksResearch

Theory of Change

Every social programme rests on a belief that doing A will lead to change B, yet that belief is rarely written down and tested. On Sustainability 360° (Bền vững 360°), FTS CSRA experts show how to build a Theory of Change: its components, indicators at each link, eight quality-check criteria and how to apply it to projects in Vietnam.